Dr. Frederic Sautet is an economist who specializes in market process and entrepreneurship research.
"Entrepreneurship” has become a buzzword in recent decades. It is not only an
important field of research but it is also a major instrument in economic
policy, and politicians of all stripes see small businesses and entrepreneurship
as a cornerstone of American success.
The hype around entrepreneurship was not always the case. In
fact for a long time between the 1920s and the 1980s, hardly anyone in economics
and policy would discuss entrepreneurship. While entrepreneurship was a
fundamental function of the market system (the system of “free enterprise”) for
economists of the 19th century, this notion disappeared completely
with the mathematization of the discipline in the following century. As P. Kilby
stated, most authors “whether explicitly or simply by virtue of omission,
consider[ed] entrepreneurial supply to have played a passive part in the drama
whose major themes were invention, changing factor prices, and new market
opportunities.” Indeed, instead of considering the entrepreneur as having the
central role in a country’s economic performance, post-WWII economics came to
consider structural conditions and other macroeconomic factors as key to growth
and development.
This has changed. Today there is plethora of research that
indicates the overwhelming importance of entrepreneurship in economic
performance. Although some of the largely shared views are sometimes not true
(e.g. empirical analysis shows that small businesses are not a major source of
new jobs), it is still the case that entrepreneurship is the driving force of
the market, to paraphrase Israel Kirzner.
In order to understand why entrepreneurship has become so
important in economics, policy, and politics, it is important to go back to the
root of the discipline and look at its theoretical foundations. One distinction
that is important here is the one between entrepreneurship in the behavioral
sense (i.e. what entrepreneurs do) and entrepreneurship in the cognitive sense
(i.e. what entrepreneurs are, or what the function of entrepreneurship consists
of). Grasping this difference is vital because without it, one does not
understand why many authors use the same word (“entrepreneurship”) but seem to
talk about different things. In my next post, I’ll develop the ideas behind this
distinction.
I really enjoyed reading this post about entrepreneurship! Immersing myself in this program for the past few months has helped me to realize what an entrepreneurial spirit I possess (I believe in the behavioral sense). I plan to develop my own business after graduation, and it is exciting to learn that I may be part of the driving force of the market! I look forward to learning more fully the distinction between the cognitive and behavioral forms of entrepreneurship.
ReplyDelete--Julie Larkin