By: Dr. Brian Engelland
A spirited political
debate is taking shape around the world.
The issue is whether wealth redistribution or wealth creation should be
the more important consideration driving national policies. One side maintains that those at the upper end
of the income distribution should be taxed more heavily so that governments may
increase social services to those less well off. The other side argues that tax
rates should be flattened so that the economy grows and more wealth is created.
The Catholic Church tries to distance herself from political
debate, but she does provide good guidance based upon the teachings of Christ
and the integration of faith and reason.
The Church has long advocated a “just” distribution of the world’s
wealth. But what does she mean by this?
A document released in March by the Pontifical Council of
Justice and Peace, and signed by His Eminence Cardinal Peter Turkson, provides
a very good explanation. But before we go to
the particulars, we first need to review the Church’s teachings on three
key related concepts: the universal destination of goods, the fair wage, and the
right to private property. After we have
these concepts firmly in mind, we can more fully understand what the Church
means by a “just” distribution of wealth.
The universal destination of material goods is
the principle that all creation is ultimately God’s and, therefore, belongs to
all God’s creatures. The world’s wealth is intended to be developed to benefit
everyone—rich and poor, powerful and weak, now and in the future—so it follows
that all resources are conferred with a social
mortgage: those who are given wealth must do something good with it. As demonstrated in the parable of the talents
(Matthew 25:14-30), those who are given more are expected to do more with what
they’ve been given.
A fair wage is the
amount needed to support a thrifty and upright worker and his family, plus
enough extra so that the worker can save and acquire property of his own. Human labor tends to be undervalued for what
it can produce, and negotiations between employer and employee tend to be uneven. Accordingly, the Church expects every employer
to pay a fair wage, and assigns the responsibility for ensuring fair wages jointly
between employers and the state.
Private property is
the result of worker savings and provides a buffer against difficult times. The Church regards private property ownership
as necessary to undergird an individual’s personal freedom and dignity – the
freedom to choose and act in a way consistent with God’s calling. It is an error to say that private property
is necessary simply because it gives you something to live on. Rather, private
property is necessary for control and responsibility, and that’s where freedom
and dignity arise.
And private property does something else: it makes
charitable acts possible. Without
private property ownership, one has nothing material to give. But with private
property, an individual can make a decision in love to give to another
something of value. This provides teeth
to what is called the preferential option for the poor, a special primacy in the application of
Christian charity directed at those whose living conditions interfere with
their proper growth and development (Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the
Church). The exercise of charity is a
personal responsibility.
Now let’s return to the issue of what the Church really
means by a “just” distribution of wealth.
The Peace and Justice Document I mentioned earlier is called The Vocation of Business Leaders and provides
the following advice: Creators of wealth, the document says, “must find ways to
make a just distribution of this wealth to employees (following the principle
of the right to a just wage), customers (just prices), owners (just returns),
suppliers (just prices), and the community (through just tax rates).”
The Church recognizes that we’re not dealing with a
“zero-sum” game. Wealth must be created before it can be distributed, and
wealth is created when those with an entrepreneurial spirit direct their
energy, talent and resources to create the goods and services that people need. They become the faithful servant that takes
the five that is given them, invests it, and produces five more. Society needs many more of these productive servants.
But just producing more is not
sufficient in God’s eyes. One must also do something good with the wealth
created so that one “pays off” its social mortgage.
How does someone do this? First, by paying fair wages so that
employees can take care of family obligations and at the same time accumulate
wealth that can be distributed. This creates a multiplicative effect in which everyone
excels. The size of the pie and the size of each slice become larger! Second, by operating in a just fashion,
respecting the legitimate interests of all stakeholders and rewarding each according
to their contribution. Finally, by freely
giving property, in charity, so as to assist those who need help.
A government’s legitimate role is to maintain a predictable and
just economic system, provide a safety net for those in dire trouble, and
collect a just amount in taxes to pay for it all. But unfortunately, many
governments around the world institute laws and regulations that drive down
wages, set high marginal tax rates that effectively discourage economic
development, or make it difficult for small businesses to begin and thrive. Governments also err by providing services in
a way that creates dependency instead of freedom, downplays the important role
of private property and diminishes charitable contributions. These approaches
are directly opposed to what the Church regards as a “just” distribution of
wealth.
Rather,
government can facilitate a just distribution of wealth by using their taxing
authority to promote the payment of fair wages, improving economic development,
facilitating the ownership of productive private property, and increasing the
exercise of personal charity. All of
these actions help individuals live out their calling.
Brian T.
Engelland
Professor of
Marketing
The Catholic
University of America
No comments:
Post a Comment